Archive | All Posts

Buy American

Buy American! Or Not.

We hear it all the time: “Buy American”. Indeed, presidential candidate Rick Santorum (who semi-won the Iowa caucuses last night) just received the endorsement of the Conservative Party USA because he apparently “understands that ‘Buy American’ is the key to reviving the US economy”. I am not going to guess as to Mr. Santorum’s motives…
Continue Reading 8
Monopoly Revisited

Monopoly Revisited

We’ve been having some profitable discussion on the threat of monopoly in a recent post.  In this post, I want to clarify a few things, and perhaps add some additional thoughts. We have established that is impossible to distinguish “competitive prices” from “monopoly prices” because we only observe the market price.  The “competitive price” is…
Continue Reading 4

More Fallacious Views on Infrastructure ‘Investment’

Piggy-backing off libertas’ post from a few days ago, Think Progress has again made the fallacy of assuming that government expenditures on infrastructure is inherently beneficial to the economy. See quote below: With borrowing costs low and the nation’s unemployment rate high, infrastructure improvement projects can fix the major problems facing our nation’s roads, bridges,…
Continue Reading 2
circular flow1

DeLong’s ‘Circular Flow’ Falls Flat

Economist Brad DeLong wrote on his blog yesterday about Paul Krugman’s “A Note on the Ricardian Equivalence Argument Against Stimulus.”  While the post was quite complex and requires a previous knowledge of Krugman’s argument, he makes one claim I would like to point out. “He gets it completely wrong because Krugman knows very well who…
Continue Reading 1
Debt Mythology

Debt Mythology

Paul Krugman implies that deficit spending is necessary to jumpstart a floundering economy, and in the process repeats the well-known “we owe it to ourselves” fallacy about public debt in his latest piece. The implication of the “we owe the debt to ourselves” fallacy is that debt isn’t all that harmful or distortionary because, after…
Continue Reading 2
OG Mission Impossible logo

Mission Impossible: War and the Economy

Arms Dealer: “Why should I help you?” Hunt: “If you don’t help me, we will be facing war.” Arms Dealer: “But war is good for business.” Hunt: “Nuclear war?” Arms Dealer: “…let’s talk.” I certainly did not expect to be writing about economics in response to seeing Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol last night (a…
Continue Reading 5
AustrianSchool

Did The Economist Present Austrian Theory Accurately?

As krlatham pointed out yesterday, it is wonderful to see the Austrian school get a shout out in such a noted publication as The Economist. While it is true, in a sense, that all publicity is good publicity, there were some shortcomings in The Economist’s representation of Austrian theory. The author writes that “Austrians see…
Continue Reading 4
monopoly

The Monopoly Bogeyman

As this late 2010 article predicted, 2011 was indeed a year for mergers. The most noteworthy was AT&T’s attempt to buy T-Mobile. The attempted move by AT&T would have given them an estimated 43% of the market share for cellular phone providers. This number drew the ire of United States regulators which eventually landed AT&T…
Continue Reading 15
Bridge to Nowhere

Bridge to Nowhere

Krugman makes his latest argument with nothing but a few words and a lonely chart which shows the recent drop-off in government infrastructure “investment.” Contrary to Krugman’s worldview in which “full employment” is the only feasible economic ideal, employment is only “good” when it occurs voluntarily under market processes.  Why?  Because working for working’s sake…
Continue Reading 2

Incomplete Logic Strikes Again!

Pat Garofalo of Think Progress bemoans the worsening housing crisis as housing prices fall ever lower despite marginal gains in employment. To be clear, Pat is just expanding on a recent Wall Street Journal piece. What both articles highlight is the fact housing prices have failed to rebound. Low home values have made it much…
Continue Reading 3